HARMONISASI PRINSIP MUAMALAH DENGAN UUD 1945 UNTUK PENGUATAN EKONOMI YANG BERKEADILAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62263/Keywords:
Harmonisasi Hukum, Prinsip Muamalah, Ekonomi KonstitusionalAbstract
The development of economic activities in Indonesia not only requires certainty and efficiency, but must also be directed toward the creation of fair economic relationships that benefit society. This need has a constitutional basis in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, which establishes solidarity, economic democracy, efficiency with justice, sustainability, and the people’s prosperity as integral components of the direction for managing the national economy. In this context, the principles of muamalah are relevant for examination because they embody the values of justice, public welfare, balance, voluntary consent, trustworthiness, and the prohibition of harmful business practices. This study aims to analyze how the principles of muamalah can be harmonized with constitutional economic values in order to strengthen the national economic and business law systems. This study employs a normative legal research method using both the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of primary sources namely the 1945 Constitution and laws and regulations related to business law and Islamic economics as well as secondary sources such as books, journals, and research findings. The legal materials were collected through a literature review and analyzed using a qualitative-prescriptive approach by aligning the principles of muamalah with the values contained in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution. The results show indicate that there is a strong convergence between the principles of muamalah and constitutional economics, particularly in terms of justice, solidarity, the public interest, balance, and the protection of the vulnerable. Harmonization of the two can be achieved by reinforcing these values in the formulation and implementation of national economic law. This harmonization is not intended to transform the national legal system into a sharia legal system, but rather to enrich economic law with universal values that are in line with Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. Thus, the principles of muamalah can serve as a source of values in building a national economic system that is more just, inclusive, and oriented toward the prosperity of society
References
Agustine, Oly Viana. “Konstitusi Ekonomi Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASeAn (MeA) Tahun 2015.” Jurnal Konstitusi 11, no. 4 (2016): 759. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1148.
Alamudi, Ichwan Ahnaz. “Relasi Hukum Dan Ekonomi Dalam Pendekatan Filsafat.” JURNAL DARUSSALAM: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara Dan Perbandingan Mazhab 3, no. 2 (2023): 261–87. https://doi.org/10.59259/jd.v3i2.62.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi Ekonomi. Kedua. Jakarta: Kompas, 2016.
Damanik, Ade Zuki. “Pendekatan Muamalah Dalam Mengatasi Tantangan Ekonomi Kontemporer.” Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora 2, no. 4 (2024): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i4.1706.
Halim, Abdillah. “Perkembangan Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia.” Investama : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis 8, no. 2 (2023): 101–20. https://doi.org/10.56997/investamajurnalekonomidanbisnis.v8i2.962.
Harvelian, Agnes. “Constitutional Court and the Enforcement of Indonesia Economics Constitution.” Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 3 (2016): 531–550. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1333.
Jannah, Elmi, Herdifa Pratama, and Muhajirin. “Aspek Hukum Dalam Pengembangan Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia.” Journal Muslimpreneur 4, no. 2 (2024): 53–67. https://doi.org/10.57215/muslimpreneur.v4i2.448.
Madjid, St. Salehah. “Prinsip-Prinsip (Asas-Asas) Muamalah.” Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (J-HES) 2, no. 1 (2018): 14–28. https://doi.org/10.26618/j-hes.v2i1.1353.
Maharani, Dewi, and Muhammad Yusuf. “Implementasi Prinsip-Prinsip Muamalah Dalam Transaksi Ekonomi: Alternatif Mewujudkan Aktivitas Ekonomi Halal.” TAWAZUN : Journal of Sharia Economic Law 4, no. 1 (2021): 72. https://doi.org/10.21043/tawazun.v4i1.8338.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Nurfaizal. “Prinsip-Prinsip Muamalah Dan Inplementasinya Dalam Hukum Perbankan Indonesia.” Hukum Islam 13, no. 2 (2013): 192–205. https://doi.org/10.24014/hi.v13i2.979.
Ruslina, Elli. “Makna Pasal 33 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Ekonomi Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 9, no. 1 (2012): 49–82. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk913.
Suradi, Suradi, Setiadi Setiadi, Ahmad Hasan Ridwan, and Atang Abdul Hakim. “Analisis Norma Nash Dan Qanun Dalam Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi Syariah.” Ad-Deenar: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam 7, no. 01 (2023): 83–98. https://doi.org/10.30868/ad.v7i01.4062.
Syahuri, Taufiqurrohman. “Politik Hukum Perekonomian Berdasarkan Pasal 33 UUD 1945.” Jurnal Konstitusi 9, no. 2 (2012): 243–57. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk921.
Utami, Rismanika Nurul, and Sri Wigati. “Implementasi Tujuan Dan Prinsip Sistem Ekonomi Islam Di Indonesia.” Al Ujrah (Jurnal Ekonomi Islam) 2, no. 1 (2023): 37–50. https://ejournal.staialakbarsurabaya.ac.id/index.php/al-ujrah/article/view/83.
Warsono. “Koperasi Dan Gagasan Konstitusi Ekonomi Indonesia Dalam Kerangka Pasal 33 Uud 1945.” Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum 1, no. 1 (2016): 91–104. https://doi.org/10.36356/hdm.v17i2.1497.
Zulfikar, Ahmad Arif, and Niken Junika Sari. “Analisis Perkembangan Ekonomi Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi Islam.” Jurnal Analis Hukum 7, no. 1 (2024): 32–55. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v7i1.4648.
